I have the standard version of 2.6 and have been using it with our
Pick3 game. I have done pretty good so far.
I want to apply it to our 649 game. I personally don't think it
will be effective in analyzing the column by column numbers of the lottery
draw since there is such a swing in the numbers. . What I have done is
written a program to put the numbers into decades (1-9,10-19,20-19,30-39,40-49)
and then run the Integer analysis on that data. I normally get 3 out of
15 and have had as much as 5 using this method. But, I know little of neural
networks other than they are a "pattern" analysis. The biggest trend I
have been able to use is 7 but the results are normally more consistent
at 5. I am thinking about breaking the data down into sections of 7 instead
of 10. I don't know if there is any validity in what I am doing and I would
ask your opinion on it. I feel that how the data is laid out must have
a bearing on what the analysis finds.
I have not really had much success in using the + and - method and
looking for the most likely smallest and biggest pick. It seems to do better
if I just use the best two choices from each decade.
Thanks for the great program at such a reasonable price, that is
so easy to use and well-documented.
As my winnings increase I intend to purchase the next version up.
Dennis Tretiak
Nipawin, SK. Canada
My suggestion is rollback: Delete the last 6 numbers; save and run.
See if
the file works. If it does, then re-enter the last row of numbers.
Otherwise, you might have accidentally deleted some number in the middle,
that will take more time to figure out.
Another possibility: how many rows of data do you have? the number of
rows
in the standard version should be less than 10,000. I do not know if
this is
your problem.
Have a Nice Day,
Gina
Question:
> Dear Sir :
> I have purchased Predictor 2.6 some time ago and I use it to play
Lotto.
> I'm happy to tell you that the Predictor's predictons are very accurate.
> But I have a problem. As you know, every week I must update my Lotto
file
> witha new draw. Well, when
I add the last draw in the file, I receive a remark
> thatsays : "last row is not
completed", or something like that. And "Please see
> Initialize/test Input File". But the truth is that the row that I
entered is complete.
> I entered the 6 numbers. So, I don't know why I receive such a remark
! And
> of course, Predictor don't give me any predicton under such conditions.
> Please, instruct me about that problem. What can I do to update correctly
my
> draws' file ?
> Thank you very much
Software: Attrasoft Predictor 2.6.
Symptom: run an example by clicking �Example/ ��, and get an error "File I/O Error file not loaded".
Reason: All examples are stored in the default directory, C:\Program Files\Attrasoft\Predictor 2.6\. If you leave this directory by clicking �File/Open� or �File/Save As�, you will get this error.
Solution: Close the program and restart (you will be back to the default directory), you will be able to run the examples.
Q:I followed your instruction
and it worked with the sample data that was
given to me on the disk. However when I am using my own data,
I open it,
link it,and test it and then click "example markov chain" and I get
an error
"File I/O Error file not loaded" and in the title bar it has "
D_math2a.txt". How do I get it to recognize my files?
thank you
Special thanks for your advise and prompt help.
I realy apreciate your free help and ofcourse I will mention Attrasoft, Gina
in my desertation under "ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS"
I'am very happy with these PREDICTED results "within 2"
This is PERFECT !
Ofcourse to handel/run my large datafile I will need the updated Predictor 100K Version.
Can you give me a special (non profit) price for the 100K Version ?
Thanks
Best regards from Holland/Europe
You stated:
�This process is repeated again and again to see how
mother nature is fluctuating
the growth. In manual charting I found remarkabel patterns in the historical data
and I believe in case there is a certain growth-pattern it is predictibel.�
For better prediction, we want to eliminate the fluctuation.
To do this, I use a 5-average. Please see attached data file.
I isolated the last 10 numbers for testing.
Parameters:
Precision level = 36
Trend = 15
It follows when the numbers are increasing, one should use �-prediction�.
When the numbers are decreasing, one should use �+prediction�.
The commands are "10-average/+Integer" and "10-average/-Integer".
When the numbers are decreasing, "10-average/+Integer" will be used. When the prediction curve turnsflat, stop using this command and change to "10-average/-Integer".
The last 10 integers are:
20
17
15
13
12
19
21
23
25
25
The process will take two runs. The first 5 are decreasing, so the command is "10-average/+Integer".
The results are:
18668442
16594282
14389114
12288664
12176986
12175636ç== flat, discard
12121332
12118708
1195084
1169248
Append the following to the data file.
20
17
15
13
12
Now the next 5 are increasing, so the command is "10-average/-Integer".
The results are:
17118888
20142932
21179984
23130084
2383380
2363480ç== flat, discard
2340254
2347012
2344452
24216392
Together:
RealPredicted
2018
1716
1514
1312
1212
1917
21 20
2321
2523
2523
All predictions are within 2.
This result is about as good as it gets.
If you run 10 times instead of two times, you might be able to get a better result. It is hard to beat �within 2�.
You have one alternative: since your computer collects one reading every 10 seconds, it is possible for you to collect 250,000 measurements, even 1,000,000;you might getbetter results with a larger data file.
I will run the 100K Predictor soon.
A:
I'am very curious for these results.
I
have 2 questions:
(1) When you collect 37 measurements, you mean you measure the same variable 37 times, say once every 39 minutes around the clock, correct?
A:
YES, the same variable 37 times, once every 60 seconds around the clock.
This is a full automatic process.
What I need to know is: you are not reading from 37 different instrument readings, are you? but rather reading the same instrument repeatedly, correct?
A:
YES,
I'am reading the same instrument repeatedly.
Background
forquestion 2.
It is important to collect all variables. Otherwise, the prediction will fail. Here is an example in the Predictor:
A:
I understand this is very important.
My theory:
I believe that the growt rate has a limited permutation and this is NOT a random process.
I repeat again and again this process to register the outcome and see how mother nature is fluctuating
Finally, I hope to find the basic patterns in my data.
Other Factors? Possibel parameters could be temperature and atmospheric pressure.
These 2 parameters are constant in a clean room under laboratorium conditions so we can
neglect this.
I hope this will help.
Best
regards, Sandor Kovacs
I will run the 100K Predictor soon.
I have 2 questions:
(1) When you collect 37 measurements, you mean you measure the same variable 37 times, say once every 39 minutes around the clock, correct? What I need to know is: you are not reading from 37 different instrument readings, are you? but rather reading the same instrument repeatedly, correct?
Background forquestion 2.
It is important to collect all variables. Otherwise, the prediction will fail. Here is an example in the Predictor:
Let a system be defined by a triplet ( x, y, z ). They obey:
x (n+1) = ( x (n) + y(n) + z(n)) Mod 7;
y (n+1) =x ( n );
z(n+1 ) = y ( n) Mod 5.
Starting from (1 0 0), here is the generated sequence:
*
*
3
100
110
211
421
042
604
360
231
623
462
541
354
530
153
210
321
632
463
641
464
041
504
250
020
202
420
642
564
151
010
101
210
321
632
463
641
464
041
504
250
020
202
420
642
564
151
010
101
210
321
632
463
641
464
041
504
250
020
202
420
642
564
151
010
101
210
321
632
463
64 1
Run the Predictor and click �10 Average/+ Linear�, we obtain:
464384000
041384000
504384000
250384000
020384000
202384000
420384000
642384000
564384000
151384000
This result is 100% CORRECT.Now let us use an INCOMPLETE model, say, y-column only. Here is the data:
*
*
1
10
1
1
2
4
0
6
3
2
6
4
5
3
5
1
2
3
6
4
6
4
0
5
2
0
2
4
6
5
1
0
1
2
3
6
4
6
4
0
5
2
0
2
4
6
5
1
0
1
2
3
6
4
6
4
0
5
2
0
2
4
6
5
1
0
1
2
3
6
4
Now run the Predictor and we get:
625120
424832
124674
524576
224672
124576
224576
424576
530720
41280
Compare this with the correct answer:
|
6
|
|
4
|
|
0
|
|
5
|
|
2
|
|
0
|
|
2
|
|
4
|
|
6
|
|
5
|
We can see the problem.
in
the range between 0-36, so I have 37 variabels."
If
your data is enzyme growth rate in digital form
I
have ONE VARIABLE with 37 VALUES.
Sorry
for my mis-interpretation.
why
the historical values of the growth rate will determine the future growth
rate?
I
have isolated enzyme and injected with a chem.solution
and
now I start to analyse/observe read the growt-rate represented
in
digital form from value between 0-36.
After
I have collected 37 measurments (this is one round/cycle)
I
reset/callibrate and restart repeat the process for the next round/cycle
to observe
again
37 measurments to see how the growt-rate develops.
This
process is repeated again and again to see how mother nature is fluctuating
In
manual charting I found remarkabel patterns in the historical data
and
I believe in case there is a certain growth-pattern it is predictibel.
If
you can, please read the manual for the prediction theory part, so we can
communicate better.
Thanks
and I will take a closer look.
A:
That's
correct.
The data file contains about 10,600 numbers.
A:
Yes
and I have used this dataset with Predictor Vers. 2.6
Can you send us a data file which has all 37,000 numbers.
A:
Yes,
I will send it as attachment my coplete dataset of 37000 measurments.
Also, the Predictor 2.6 has 10,000 limits on several places, the number of rows in the data file must be less than 10,000.
A:
I did NOT know this limit.
In
the manual I read that Predictor can handel terrabyte of data.
I will use the 100K version to run your data on 37,000 integers.
A:
I'am
very curious for these results.
On your part, please justify WHY the historical growth rate can determine the furture growth rate??????
If you cannot justify this, your approach has a problem. Please read the Predictor manual for the prediction model.
A:
Read my explanation in before last e-mail.
Question:
you said "My data is representing enzyme growth
rate in digital form
in
the range between 0-36, so I have 37 variabels."
If
your data is enzyme growth rate in digital form in the range between 0-36,
then you have ONE variable with 37 values, not 37 variables. Please explain,
ONE variable or 37?
If
37 variables, what are they?
If
one variable, why will the historical values of the growth rate determine
the future growth rate?
I
checked your data file with the assumption that the data is the "growth
rate", and the data model has one and only one variable. The data file
contains about 10,600 numbers. Can you send us a data file which has all
37,000 numbers.
Also,
the Predictor 2.6 has a 10,000 limit: the number of rows in the data file
must be less than 10,000. I will use the 100K version to run your data
on 37,000 rows.
On your part, please justify WHY the historical growth rate can determine the future growth rate??????
If
you cannot justify this, your approach has a problem.
Enzyme Research:
My data is representing enzyme growth rate in digital form
in the range between 0-36, so I have 37 variabels.
I have already collected 37.000 measurments.
Details on my data procedure
see below in my before last message.
See my collected data as attachment file: Enzyme Data1.txt
Continue my Process:
Datafile will be updated after I have collected 37
NEW measurments.
For my research I will need the
BEST POSSIBEL PREDICTION for the number(s) in the
next row.
Please advise HOW to achive this.
Is my data formatting/ Setup/handling correct?
*
Enzyme
Data1
*
1
19
18
34
31
36
36
�
Thanks
Best regards
Erik....What application did you use the DecisionMaker for Doc?.........Britney is great!
Wole....Are you using the DecisionMaker for Stocks or lottery?
Wiemel...You said the DecisionMaker was useful. What is your application?
Gina <gina@attrasoft.com>
- Wednesday, June 28, 2000 at 18:54:25 (EDT)
Possible reasons:
(1) You are using NT or Windows 2000: a NT version has to be ordered;
(2) If you are using Win95/98, but win95/98 is not installed in C drive: create a folder C:\Windows\Temp\.
This should solve your problems.
Ying
Ying <ying@attrasoft.com>
Savannah, GA USA - Wednesday, May 17, 2000 at 12:49:29 (EDT)
Buildings, roads, rivers, ... Yes.
Cars: 1-meter resolution might not be good enough.
Ying
Ying <ying@attrasoft.com>
Savannah, GA USA - Wednesday, May 16, 2000 at 12:49:29 (EDT)
Gina <gina@attrasoft.com>
Savannah, GA USA - Thursday, March 01, 2000 at 07:13:37 (EST)
Operating an imagebase is very similar to operating a relational
database. Therefore the administration of an imagebase is very similar
to the administration of a relational database. ImageFinder adds "Content-based
image retrieval" (content-based query) to a relational database. A relational
database already has "Keyword based retrieval" (query) and image management
abilities. For info on the administrative end of a relational database,
many books are available, say, Microsoft Access. Gina
Gina <gina@attrasoft.com>
Savannah, GA USA - Tuesday, July 13, 1999 at 12:20:42 (EDT)
Please
add your comments to this discussion group. Thanks.